Comments on: A pharmacy “vending machine”

By: Monica Matys

Monica Matys — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:02:23 +0000

I appreciate your comments, and for many reasons, this concept was never meant to replace the traditional pharmacy. In many instances, face to face interaction is critical. It’s also preferred by many patients and pharmacists. However, the PharmaTrust model does offer another valuable option for many patients, especially those living in more remote communities.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:51:49 +0000

Drug vending machines do not allow the pharmacist to detect the physical cues of the patient. The smell of alcohol on a patient’s breath can allow the pharmacist to intervene when a dangerous drug interaction may occur. This is the case with drugs such as tranquilizers, antidepressants, and warfarin to name a few. A physical barrier between the pharmacist and patient does not allow a relationship to develop which could facilitate patient care.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:44:05 +0000

An ATM approach to health care does not appeal to many. Why put a barrier between the pharmacist and the patient?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 01 May 2010 01:49:43 +0000

Brilliant idea–this is a quintessential response to consumer needs. Kudos to Sunnybrook for daring to be innovative and challenge the status quo and turf protection. Best of success to PharmaTrust–when are you coming to my community?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:08:23 +0000

Neat! Great idea!